The Peljesac Bridge - a bridge to nowhere ?

In 2013, there was a parliamentary question in the EU Parliament on the proposed Peljesac bridge - a mega-project on the Croatian Adriatic coast - as to why and how  Europe was involved.

Here is the answer given by European Commissioner Hahn (Regional Development):

Parliamentary questions

 
18 September 2013
E-009451/2013
Answer given by Mr Hahn on behalf of the Commission

<<A pre-feasibility study is in preparation, aiming at identifying all available transport options to link the Dubrovnik region with the rest of Croatia, taking into account financial, socioeconomic and environmental criteria to compare the different options.

The Croatian authorities are in charge of the contract of this pre-feasibility study, in consultation with authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Commission. Depending on the result of the study, further project documentation such as design, full feasibility study, cost-benefit analysis, environmental impact assessment and other documents will be prepared for the preferred option. Only later will the Croatian authorities decide whether to co-finance the chosen project under the European Structural and Investment Funds, in which case a major project application will need to be prepared and submitted to the Commission.

The Commission is closely following the preparation of the study.>>

The arguments

Why a bridge can actually separate rather than unite.........

The proposed bridge link

This map from the EU pre-feasbility study of 2014 shows the planned link

It shows that of course land routes exist that run up and down the coast - they just happen to pass over a small part of Bosnia. Why is that such a problem in a Europe supposed to be united ?

The sensitive marine environment......

Unique

The unique oysters harvested in the bay of Mali Ston would be under threat from the proposed bridge

The beauty of the Croatian coastline

would be marred by a structure that would end up being a "cathedral in a (traffic) desert" - there is no way a 0.5 billion EUR project could be justified for economic reasons

......even if feasibility studies will try to prove the contrary